ReachMD XM157 now presents this week’s top stories from the pages of American Medical News, the nations leading newspaper for physicians. American Medical News is published by the American Medical Association.
Welcome to American Medical News on ReachMD XM157, I am Dr. Mark Chyna, and I am Sue Berg.
MS. SUE BERG:
On this weeks programs FTC delays enforcement of Identity Theft Red Flag Rules, palliative care programs are on the rise and the American Academy of Family Physicians meeting includes lectures by patients. Now with a top story from American Medical News, here is Dr. Mark Chyna.
DR. MARK CHYNA:
The federal trade commissions says, it will delay enforcement of new regulations to combat identity theft so that it may give physicians and the healthcare industry time to comply. The so called red flag rules had to take effect in November, required physicians and group practices and others to establish a written program for preventing and identifying identity theft. The regulations pertain mainly the financial institutions that provide credit, but the FTC says they would also apply to most physicians in practices, who do not always collect payment at the time services are rendered. Authorities say that doctors might want to seek legal counsel to find out whether the regulations applied to them and what they need to do to comply. Jeril Dalas is vice-chair of the American Health Lawyers Associations health information technology practice group. The trade organization held a conference recently to discuss the regulation.
JERIL DALAS:
The first means to do so is using the red flags that are mentioned in the recent FTC Red Flag Rules, ironically those have been extended, the enforcement has been extended to May 1, 2009, but the program that the FTC in vision sets forth several red flags, which should be taken in to account when the creditor in this case a physician is looking to prevent identity theft.
DR. MARK CHYNA:
The American Medical Association and other medical associations are challenging the FTC’s rule. They say physician should not be considered creditors.
MS. SUE BERG:
Beginning in January, Medicare will pay a 2% bonus to physicians, who use electronic prescriptions, the bonuses will decrease in future years, and starting in 2012 physicians, who have not adopted electronic prescriptions will be docked 1% of their Medicare pay. These penalties will increase in subsequent years. Only 6% of physicians now write electronic prescriptions. One problem is the Drug Enforcement Administrations ban on electronic prescribing of controlled substances that forces physicians to maintain 2 separate systems. The DEA has proposed lifting the ban, but has not done so yet. Medicare has also made it hard for vendors to incorporate formularies into their programs and small pharmacies have resisted investing in the equipment to process electronic prescriptions. The centers for Medicare and Medicaid services hosted a recent conference in Boston to jump-start its e-prescribing push. The American Medical Association the conference sponsor joined with other event sponsors to release a new publication of clinicians guide to electronic prescribing. The guide offers practical advice for physicians who want to adopt the technology into their practices. As well as a list of incentives offered in various states. However, a new AMA e-prescribing framework said any Medicare penalty must not take effect until at least 2 years are CMS finalizes e-prescribing standards for physicians.
DR. MARK CHYNA:
From this week government and medicine section, West Virginia is offering a novel medicaid program that uses incentives to boost enroll these personal responsibility for their health care. Medicare enrollees, who agreed to follow doctors orders and wellness plan and to show up on time for appointments receive extra benefits these include quit smoking programs and membership in Weight Watchers. Shannon Landra, this is spokeswoman for the West Virginia Bureau for medical services in Charleston.
SHANNON LANDRA:
Now in health choices is our effort to improve medicaid members health here in West Virginia. We are trying to do that by getting our members too engaged in the healthcare system and in their own health in way that is wellness driven and not crisis driven. In order to enroll and enhance plans members have to go for a checkup and choose the sign of member agreement to enroll in the enhancement benefit package. Part of that is developing a health improvement plan with their primary care physician at the medical home. We are doing this because we think it is very important for these young members who are in the target population for mountain health choices to develop healthy habits, which include regular check up and preventative care with their primary care providers and their medical homes at an early age.
DR. MARK CHYNA:
Enrollment in the enhanced plan has so far been low possibly because word of the opportunity has not reached many patients. If the West Virginia program is successful it could persuade other states to launch similar programs. The West Virginia program is controversial because it automatically bounces non-participating beneficiaries into the basic plan. Dr. Fernando Indacochea is president of the West Virginia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. He says these patients encounter more restrictions than in traditional medicaid.
DR. FERNANDO INDACOCHEA:
There are a number of limitations the first one I think the most important one is the limits on prescriptions. The number of prescriptions that the child can receive any given month. The limit at this point will be 4. So if the child has not enrolled in the expanded plan, you know will not be allowed to receive more than 4 prescriptions per month and the number of kids with chronic illnesses will easily surpass that. Some of these kids have 2 or more chronic illnesses and sometimes they have acute illnesses that you have to deal with.
DR. MARK CHYNA:
West Virginia is working with researchers at West Virginia University to assess the programs effectiveness.
MS. SUE BERG:
From the American Medical News professional issues section a Minnesota Appeals Court has ruled that non-disciplinary settlements between doctors and licensing boards cannot be used as evidence in medical liability cases. Like many states Minnesota excludes the use of settlements in civil actions, but the plain tiff in this case argued that an agreement for corrective action should be considered because it was imposed by the board. The case stem from a patient’s complaint filed against podiatrist Roy Buckmaster after complications arose following 2 surgeries he performed. Dr. Buckmaster and the Minnesota Board of Podiatric Medicine agreed to resolve the matter through a corrective action. In these situations, a doctor typically consents to certain practice improvements to resolve a complaint without disciplinary action. The patient later filed a negligence case and attached the corrective action to support her claim. The Minnesota court ruled that corrective actions constitute a settlement. The court said that discouraging settlements would undermine licensing boards over side authority. David Schultz is Dr. Buckmasters attorney. He says the ruling could set a president for other states.
DAVID SCHULTZ:
In Minnesota, I think it sets a very clear president and agreement between a licensing board and a doctor or other health care provider to resolve a complaint that has been made with relevant board. It is per se a settlement agreement and as such it is not admissible at trial and it certainly cannot be used for any kind of admission of wrongdoing or liability or anything wrong with care.
MS. SUE BERG:
The patient’s attorney says there are no plans to appeal to the state supreme court.
DR. MARK CHYNA: